issue_comments: 345333385
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1725#issuecomment-345333385 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1725 | 345333385 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTMzMzM4NQ== | 2443309 | 2017-11-17T18:58:08Z | 2017-11-17T18:58:08Z | MEMBER |
I'm really not opposed to this. I also think it would be a good/reasonable thing to do before 1.0. There may be some pure-numpy Xarray users out there but I suspect they could 1) handle having dask as a dependency and 2) wouldn't be all that affected by the change since the in-memory workflow isn't particularly dependent on lazy evaluation. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
274797981 |