issue_comments: 345333385
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1725#issuecomment-345333385 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1725 | 345333385 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTMzMzM4NQ== | 2443309 | 2017-11-17T18:58:08Z | 2017-11-17T18:58:08Z | MEMBER |
I'm really not opposed to this. I also think it would be a good/reasonable thing to do before 1.0. There may be some pure-numpy Xarray users out there but I suspect they could 1) handle having dask as a dependency and 2) wouldn't be all that affected by the change since the in-memory workflow isn't particularly dependent on lazy evaluation. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
274797981 |