issue_comments: 341370145
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1676#issuecomment-341370145 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1676 | 341370145 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTM3MDE0NQ== | 10050469 | 2017-11-02T09:52:22Z | 2017-11-02T11:00:22Z | MEMBER |
I don't remember exactly, but it happened when I wrote tests for rasterio's indexing: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/xarray/tests/test_backends.py#L1855-L1884 (I just tested all possible combinations of index operations I could think of). The caching mechanism has some non-intuitive consequences, for example that some indexing operations not allowed on a rasterio file stored on disk become available once the data is cached: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/xarray/tests/test_backends.py#L1916-L1927 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
269996138 |