issue_comments: 336169649
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1627#issuecomment-336169649 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1627 | 336169649 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNjE2OTY0OQ== | 1217238 | 2017-10-12T15:15:59Z | 2017-10-12T15:15:59Z | MEMBER | As long as we're nit-picking style....
I slightly prefer the grayscale you had before -- the section titles are already well detached.
Love it!
It is wonderful to expose this information! I have a slight concern that the
For highlighting, maybe something a little more subtle would work well, either: 1. only highlighting the dimension names below, not the full variables, or 2. only highlight full variables with a matching name, as well as all matching dimensions. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
264747372 |