issue_comments: 328314676
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1279#issuecomment-328314676 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1279 | 328314676 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODMxNDY3Ng== | 4992424 | 2017-09-10T02:04:33Z | 2017-09-10T02:04:33Z | NONE | In light of #1489 is there a way to move forward here with In soliciting the atmospheric chemistry community for a few illustrative examples for gcpy, it's become apparent that indices computed from re-sampled timeseries would be killer, attention-grabbing functionality. For instance, the EPA air quality standard we use for ozone involves taking hourly data, computing 8-hour rolling means for each day of your dataset, and then picking the maximum of those means for each day ("MDA8 ozone"). Similar metrics exist for other pollutants. With traditional xarray data-structures, it's trivial to compute this quantity (assuming we have hourly data and using the new resample API from #1272):
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
208903781 |