issue_comments: 325723577
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1528#issuecomment-325723577 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1528 | 325723577 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNTcyMzU3Nw== | 1217238 | 2017-08-29T16:43:58Z | 2017-08-29T16:44:25Z | MEMBER |
Yes, exactly.
Typically, we store things in encoding that are attributes on the underlying NetCDF file, but no longer make sense to describe the decoded data. For example:
- On the file,
Currently, we assume that stores never do this, and always handle it ourselves. We might need a special exception for zarr and scale/offset encoding.
Maybe, though again it will probably need slightly customized conventions for writing data (if we let zarr handling scale/offset encoding).
We have two options:
1. Handle it all in xarray via the machinery in I think (2) would be the preferred way to do this. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
253136694 |