issue_comments: 321461998
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1489#issuecomment-321461998 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1489 | 321461998 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyMTQ2MTk5OA== | 1217238 | 2017-08-10T06:22:02Z | 2017-08-10T06:22:02Z | MEMBER | @jmunroe This is great functionality -- thanks for your work on this! One concern: if possible, I would like to avoid adding explicit dask graph building code in xarray. It looks like the canonical way to transform from a list of dask/numpy arrays to a dask dataframe is to make use of In [35]: import dask.dataframe as dd In [36]: import dask.array as da In [37]: x = da.from_array(np.arange(5), 2) In [38]: y = da.from_array(np.linspace(-np.pi, np.pi, 5), 2) notice that dtype is preserved properlyIn [39]: dd.concat([dd.from_array(x), dd.from_array(y)], axis=1) Out[39]: Dask DataFrame Structure: 0 1 npartitions=2 0 int64 float64 2 ... ... 4 ... ... Dask Name: concat-indexed, 26 tasks ``` Can you look into refactoring your code to make use of these? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
245624267 |