issue_comments: 321213528
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1473#issuecomment-321213528 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1473 | 321213528 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyMTIxMzUyOA== | 6815844 | 2017-08-09T10:10:58Z | 2017-08-09T11:10:14Z | MEMBER | @shoyer
Agreed. I changed the code not to overwrite coordinate.
My current implementation does this, but I am still worrying about even in this situation there will be a similar unexpected behavior, e.g. because an unexpected coordinate is attached in previous indexing, the coordinate to be attached would be silently neglected. I think we may need a careful API decision.
I am currently thinking
(assuming |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
241578773 |