issue_comments: 318788600
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1492#issuecomment-318788600 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1492 | 318788600 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxODc4ODYwMA== | 1217238 | 2017-07-29T00:11:49Z | 2017-07-29T00:12:04Z | MEMBER | To be honest, this wasn't entirely intentional: I didn't think about the difference in slice handling conventions between labeled and unlabeled arrays when we changed this in 0.9. But at this point, I would be loathe to change it. I suppose this is also an argument in favor of changing the slice convention we copied from pandas to exclusive rather than inclusive of upper bounds. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
245778442 |