issue_comments: 316381473
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1483#issuecomment-316381473 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1483 | 316381473 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNjM4MTQ3Mw== | 17701232 | 2017-07-19T13:12:03Z | 2017-07-19T13:12:03Z | NONE | @darothen yes you are right - this is definitely not a good way to apply mean - I was just using mean as a (poor) example trying not to over-complicate or distract from the issue. But, as you suggest, this is what I do when needing to apply customised functions like from scipy... which, can end up being slow. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
244016361 |