issue_comments: 315178012
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1131#issuecomment-315178012 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1131 | 315178012 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNTE3ODAxMg== | 2443309 | 2017-07-13T19:27:25Z | 2017-07-13T19:27:25Z | MEMBER | In reviewing this PR, I'm not really a fan of special casing the 1-D array in the way described above. These sorts of decisions lead to unexpected/confusing behavior when scaling up analysis. Obviously there is a tradeoff here as we diverge from how the |
{
"total_count": 3,
"+1": 3,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
190026722 |