issue_comments: 305520522
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1426#issuecomment-305520522 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1426 | 305520522 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTUyMDUyMg== | 4160723 | 2017-06-01T15:00:06Z | 2017-06-01T15:00:06Z | MEMBER | @fujiisoup I agree that given your example proposal 2 might be more intuitive, however IMHO implicit indexes seem a bit too magical indeed. Although I don't have any concrete example in mind, I guess that sometimes I would be hard to really understand what's going on. Exposing less concepts to users would be indeed an improvement, unless it makes things too implicit or magical. Let me try to give a more detailed proposal than in my previous comment, which generalizes to potential features like multi-dimensional indexers (see @shoyer's comment, which I'd be happy to start working on soon). It is actually very much like proposal 1, with only one additional concept (called "super index" below).
Examples of super indexes:
"Super index" is an additional concept that has to be understood by users, which is in principle bad, but here I think it's worth as it potentially gives a good generic model for explicit handling of various, advanced indexes that involve multiple coordinates. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
231308952 |