issue_comments: 305176003

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1192#issuecomment-305176003 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1192 305176003 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTE3NjAwMw== 3217406 2017-05-31T12:45:18Z 2017-05-31T12:45:18Z CONTRIBUTOR

The reason I ask is that, ideally, coarsen would work exactly the same with dask.array and np.ndarray data. By using both serial and parallel coarsen methods from dask, we are adding a dependency but we are ensuring forward compatibility. @shoyer, what's your preference? (1) replicate serial coarsen into xarray or (2) point to dask coarsen methods?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   198742089