issue_comments: 300650769

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/939#issuecomment-300650769 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/939 300650769 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMDY1MDc2OQ== 1217238 2017-05-11T00:41:21Z 2017-05-11T00:41:21Z MEMBER

I'd much rather have pandas.read_csv the way it is right now than to have a ReadOptions object that would need to contain exactly the same documentation and be just as hard to understand as read_csv.

Certainly I agree here. The alternative would be separating out related functionality into related groups, e.g., NameOptions, ParserOptions, MissingValueOptions, DatetimeOptions, etc., basically exactly the groupings you see in the pandas docs.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   169274464