home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 294076330

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1356#issuecomment-294076330 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1356 294076330 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5NDA3NjMzMA== 1217238 2017-04-14T03:18:30Z 2017-04-14T03:18:30Z MEMBER

wrt to the virtual variables, I think some more thinking is necessary so we can come up with a plan of approach. Do we want to deprecate this feature entirely?

This is a good question, possibly worth raising in a separate issue for discussion. I think they are a convenient shortcut, but they shouldn't be the primary interface.

Do we just want to wrap the datetime component virtual variables to the .dt accessor if they're datetime-like?

Yes, certainly. We definitely don't want to have two separate implementations of datetime components in the code base.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  220011864
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.056ms · About: xarray-datasette