home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 293881177

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1356#issuecomment-293881177 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1356 293881177 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5Mzg4MTE3Nw== 4992424 2017-04-13T12:26:24Z 2017-04-13T12:26:24Z NONE

Finished clean-up, added some documentation, etc. I mangled resolving a merge conflict with my update to whats-new.rst (5ae4e08) in terms of the commit text, but other than that I think we're getting closer to finishing this.

wrt to the virtual variables, I think some more thinking is necessary so we can come up with a plan of approach. Do we want to deprecate this feature entirely? Do we just want to wrap the datetime component virtual variables to the .dt accessor if they're datetime-like? We could very easily do the latter for 0.9.3, but maybe we should target a future major release to deprecate the virtual variables and instead encourage adding a few specialized (but commonly-used) accessors to xarray?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  220011864
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.623ms · About: xarray-datasette