home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 292930254

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1352#issuecomment-292930254 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1352 292930254 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MjkzMDI1NA== 4992424 2017-04-10T12:06:52Z 2017-04-10T12:07:03Z NONE

Yeah, I tend to agree, there should be some sort of auto-magic happening. But, I can think of at least two options:

  1. Coerce to array-like, like you do manually in your first comment here. That makes sense if the dimension is important, i.e. it carries useful metadata or encodes something important.

  2. Coerce to an attribute on the Dataset.

I use workflows where I concatenate things like multiple ensemble members into a single file, and I wind up with this pattern all the time. I usually just drop() the offending coordinate, and save it as part of the output filename. This is because tools like cdo really, really don't like non lat-lon-time dimensions, so that can interrupt my workflow sometimes. Saving as an attribute bypasses this issue, but then you lose the ability to retain any metadata that was associated with that coordinate.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  219321876
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.818ms · About: xarray-datasette