home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 292835259

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1306#issuecomment-292835259 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1306 292835259 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MjgzNTI1OQ== 1217238 2017-04-10T02:30:00Z 2017-04-10T02:30:00Z MEMBER

Are/have there beein any thoughts or discussions on whether xa would be more fitting?

Let's not open that can of worms :). I actually usually import the package as xarray these days, since I like the explicitness, and due to xarray's extensive methods it's rare to need to use many functions on one line (as one does for numpy).

I am also weekly in favor of "Xarray" for the proper name, if only to avoid "XArray". But I don't know if I care enough to update all the docs.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  213426608
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.486ms · About: xarray-datasette