home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 290256766

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1092#issuecomment-290256766 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1092 290256766 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MDI1Njc2Ng== 4160723 2017-03-29T23:26:50Z 2017-03-29T23:26:50Z MEMBER

How to handle dimensions and coordinate names when assigning groups is clearly one of the important design decisions here. It's obvious that data variables should be grouped but less clear how to handle dimensions/coordinates.

I would be +1 for allowing tuples for data variables names but not for dimensions/coordinates names. It indeed looks like that using tuples for the latter would be a greater source of confusion and would add too much complexity for only little (or no real?) benefit.

I'd be fine with raising an error when loading a netCDF4 file which have groups with conflicting dimensions or when assigning an incompatible Dataset as a new group (e.g., ds['flux'] = incompatible_ds).

For groups that share common dimensions/coordinates with some differences, a data structure built on top of Dataset (like DatasetGroup or DatasetNode) would be more appropriate I think.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  187859705
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 3.093ms · About: xarray-datasette