issue_comments: 288782907
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1198#issuecomment-288782907 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1198 | 288782907 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4ODc4MjkwNw== | 4295853 | 2017-03-23T16:44:44Z | 2017-03-23T16:44:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer, that subclass-based approach you outlined worked (fixture parameters really don't work with classes as far as I could tell). We now have more comprehensive, named testing. Note, there was one minor point that required more explicitly specification that arose from the more rigorous testing: The scipy backend can handle objects like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
199900056 |