issue_comments: 286497255
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1308#issuecomment-286497255 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1308 | 286497255 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NjQ5NzI1NQ== | 7300413 | 2017-03-14T17:27:06Z | 2017-03-14T17:31:32Z | NONE | Hello Stephan, The shape of the full data, if I read from within xarray, is (time, level, lat, lon), with level=60, lat=41, lon=480. time is I am chunking only along longitude, using lon=100. I previously chunked along time, but that used too much memory (~45GB out of 128 GB) since the data is split into one file per month, and reading annual data would require reading many files into memory. Superficially, I would think that both of the above would take similar amounts of time. In fact, calculating a daily climatology also requires grouping the four 6 hourly data points into a single day as well, which seems to be more complicated. However, it seems to run faster! Thanks, Joy |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
214088387 |