issue_comments: 285149350
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1301#issuecomment-285149350 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1301 | 285149350 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NTE0OTM1MA== | 1197350 | 2017-03-08T19:52:11Z | 2017-03-08T19:52:11Z | MEMBER | I just tried this on a few different datasets. Comparing python 2.7, xarray 0.7.2, dask 0.7.1 (an old environment I had on hand) with python 2.7, xarray 0.9.1-28-g1cad803, dask 0.13.0 (my current "production" environment), I could not reproduce. The up-to-date stack was faster by a factor of < 2. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
212561278 |