issue_comments: 281860859
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1223#issuecomment-281860859 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1223 | 281860859 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MTg2MDg1OQ== | 6042212 | 2017-02-23T01:25:52Z | 2017-02-23T01:25:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR | True, xarray_to_zarr is unchanged from before. The dataset functions could supercede, since a single xarray is just a special case of a dataset; or we could decide that for the special case it is worth having short-cut functions. I was worried about the number of metadata files being created, since on a remote system like S3, there is a large overhead to reading many small files. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
202260275 |