home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 279515654

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1262#issuecomment-279515654 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1262 279515654 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3OTUxNTY1NA== 306380 2017-02-13T20:41:50Z 2017-02-13T20:41:50Z MEMBER

To be clear, my original question was more ambitious. It may be interpreted as "should such a system be integrated directly into the XArray codebase?"

The answer of "No, it should be a standalone library that XArray wraps much in the same way it wraps around numpy or dask.array" if fine with me. Just asking. Benefits in favor would be that I suspect XArray already has mechanisms for coercion and such and it would reduce the number of total libraries. Argument against is that XArray is currently only focused on indexed and labeled arrays, and possible it doesn't want to deal with the dtype mess. So, more broadly, the question is "What is the scope of XArray?"

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  207021356
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.836ms · About: xarray-datasette