home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 278590912

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1254#issuecomment-278590912 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1254 278590912 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3ODU5MDkxMg== 1964655 2017-02-09T09:32:36Z 2017-02-09T09:32:36Z CONTRIBUTOR

Probably we should include text of each license at the appropriate locations, or at least a direct reference to the fact hat it has a different license.

That is indeed the purpose of the NOTICE file. Since the Apache license state that all source code should start with the Apache copyright header, then individual copyrights from embedded portions of code should be listed in an additional NOTICE file to comply with their respective redistribution clauses.

I'm not opposed to adding a NOTICE file

You do know you are supposed to provide one as per the Apache Software Policy, right? Details about its content and formatting are provided here.

I am also providing an example from the ITK project, since you seem to be having doubts about my statement. I can give you many more if your are still not convinced.

but I haven't seen it in other projects in the scientific Python space

Because most projects from the scientific Python stack (including Numpy and Pandas that you mentioned) use the simpler BSD-3-Clause.

Maybe we're all just being careless, though :)

Nope, just yourself in this case.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  206137485
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.976ms · About: xarray-datasette