issue_comments: 272841208
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1199#issuecomment-272841208 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1199 | 272841208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3Mjg0MTIwOA== | 4160723 | 2017-01-16T11:47:47Z | 2017-01-16T11:47:47Z | MEMBER |
Yes this does not seem like the best alternative.
+1. That was the initial implementation in #1017 I think, which is the most consistent. But @crusaderky raised an issue of readability (see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1017#issuecomment-260777664). IMO this issue of readability is more a bad habit of using the If this remains an issue, another option than the ones above would be to list dimensions with no index in a separate, dedicated section of the repr, e.g. with the examples above,
To not add too much verbosity, multiple dimensions without coord may be displayed inline:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
200125945 |