home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 264916322

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1084#issuecomment-264916322 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1084 264916322 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NDkxNjMyMg== 6200806 2016-12-05T17:20:13Z 2016-12-05T17:20:13Z CONTRIBUTOR

This looks pretty sane to me, though of course it's still missing a few nice things you can do with datetime64 (e.g., reindex and partial datetime string selection).

@shoyer and others, is there a well-defined list of required features that the new index object would need to satisfy in order to be considred for inclusion in xarray? Are the two that you mentioned must-haves? Are there others?

Wanting to make sure we're all on the same page in terms of what the target is.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  187591179
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.624ms · About: xarray-datasette