issue_comments: 263652409
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/463#issuecomment-263652409 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/463 | 263652409 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2MzY1MjQwOQ== | 1217238 | 2016-11-29T18:17:17Z | 2016-11-29T18:17:17Z | MEMBER |
Sure. This should probably be a different wrapper function than @kmpaul thanks for sharing! This is useful background. There is at least one other option worth considering. Instead of using the open file LRU cache, a simpler option could be to add an optional argument to xarray backends (building on |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
94328498 |