issue_comments: 260333267
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1115#issuecomment-260333267 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1115 | 260333267 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2MDMzMzI2Nw== | 1197350 | 2016-11-14T13:24:10Z | 2016-11-14T13:24:10Z | MEMBER | I agree this would be very useful. But it is also feature creep. There is an extremely wide range of such functions that could hypothetically be put into the xarray package. (all of scipy.signal for example) At some point the community should decide what is the intended scope of xarray itself vs. packages built on top of xarray. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
188996339 |