issue_comments: 260116620
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1080#issuecomment-260116620 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1080 | 260116620 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2MDExNjYyMA== | 941907 | 2016-11-12T11:28:02Z | 2016-11-12T11:28:02Z | NONE |
Good point, in that case explicit namespacing indeed helps.
A module-level namespace has nothing to do with the class namespace, but I see you try to tie them, which makes sense in relationship with the argument about reading code in text form. However, that may not be clear for Python programmers as those namespaces are not tied in reality, better mention it in the docs. BTW, if you are enforcing some specific style guide, please note that in the docs. And I hope you strike the right balance between style complacency and universality.
My problem with non-functional paradigms lies more in the
That is indeed a good alternative, just not sure my colleagues will like the transition from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
187373423 |