issue_comments: 256541189
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1062#issuecomment-256541189 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1062 | 256541189 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NjU0MTE4OQ== | 12307589 | 2016-10-27T04:01:55Z | 2016-10-27T04:01:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think using a more informative error when particularly year and month are used would be the right way to go. It would also probably be fine to require integer months/years, but Pandas also has weird behavior:
Because of this it would take a significant rework of decode_cf_datetime in conventions.py to actually implement integer months working properly. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
185441216 |