issue_comments: 256541189
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1062#issuecomment-256541189 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1062 | 256541189 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NjU0MTE4OQ== | 12307589 | 2016-10-27T04:01:55Z | 2016-10-27T04:01:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think using a more informative error when particularly year and month are used would be the right way to go. It would also probably be fine to require integer months/years, but Pandas also has weird behavior:
Because of this it would take a significant rework of decode_cf_datetime in conventions.py to actually implement integer months working properly. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
185441216 |