issue_comments: 236989698
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/931#issuecomment-236989698 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/931 | 236989698 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIzNjk4OTY5OA== | 10050469 | 2016-08-02T18:04:07Z | 2016-08-02T18:04:07Z | MEMBER | Once you'll have both (a DOI for the paper, a DOI from Zenodo), which one will you recommend? If I understand how Zenodo works, one possibility would be to always ask to cite the paper (for the citation records) and use Zenodo as an additional reference to a specific version of xarray? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
168848449 |