issue_comments: 222873438
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/862#issuecomment-222873438 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/862 | 222873438 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyMjg3MzQzOA== | 1217238 | 2016-06-01T02:05:42Z | 2016-06-01T02:05:42Z | MEMBER | The heuristic we use for determining if you can concatenate over a dimension includes checking if it's included as a variable: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/v0.7.2/xarray/conventions.py#L800 If a potential dummy dimension is also a variable, we don't concatenate over it. Of course, every dimension gets a variable by the time you've turned it into a dataset, so this never works on datasets, only data stores. I'm certainly open to ideas on how to improve this. Possibly accepting an explicit lists of dimensions to concatenate over (and remove) would be the way to go. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
157545837 |