issue_comments: 211044118
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/790#issuecomment-211044118 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/790 | 211044118 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMTA0NDExOA== | 2002703 | 2016-04-17T15:28:41Z | 2016-04-17T15:28:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @jhamman Small observation from your notebook: It's not good to assume a negative y-step size. Rarely, I will come across a dataset that breaks convention with a positive y coordinate, meaning the first pixel is the lower-left corner, but at least the dataset is self-consistent. Rasterio works beautifully even with these black sheep, so we don't want an xarray reader to force the assumption. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
140063713 |