issue_comments: 205492861
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/798#issuecomment-205492861 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/798 | 205492861 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNTQ5Mjg2MQ== | 1217238 | 2016-04-04T20:54:42Z | 2016-04-04T20:54:42Z | MEMBER |
Yes, this is correct. In principle, if we have a very large number of files containing many variables each, we might want to do the read in parallel using futures, and then use something like |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
142498006 |