issue_comments: 205492861
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/798#issuecomment-205492861 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/798 | 205492861 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNTQ5Mjg2MQ== | 1217238 | 2016-04-04T20:54:42Z | 2016-04-04T20:54:42Z | MEMBER | 
 Yes, this is correct. In principle, if we have a very large number of files containing many variables each, we might want to do the read in parallel using futures, and then use something like  | {
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
} | 142498006 |