issue_comments: 197939841
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/790#issuecomment-197939841 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/790 | 197939841 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE5NzkzOTg0MQ== | 2443309 | 2016-03-17T15:44:48Z | 2016-03-17T15:44:48Z | MEMBER | As for 1) I'm open to having more discussion on decoding the coordinates. My contention here is that are useful, even in their unstructured format, since it permits visualization out of the box. I'll ping @perrygeo for more on this. 2) I don't really want to get into this because there isn't a standard treatment in geotiffs so it would, at best, be a guess on our end. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
140063713 |