issue_comments: 196924992
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/793#issuecomment-196924992 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/793 | 196924992 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE5NjkyNDk5Mg== | 1217238 | 2016-03-15T17:04:57Z | 2016-03-15T17:27:29Z | MEMBER | I did a little digging into this and I'm pretty sure the issue here is that HDF5 cannot do multi-threading -- at all. Moreover, many HDF5 builds are not thread safe. Right now, we use a single shared lock for all reads with xarray, but for writes we rely on dask.array.store, which only uses different locks for each array it writes. Because @pwolfram's HDF5 file includes multiple variables, each of these gets written with their own thread lock -- which means we end up writing to the same file simultaneously from multiple threads. So what we could really use here is a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
140291221 |