issue_comments: 175390102
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175390102 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/727 | 175390102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NTM5MDEwMg== | 1217238 | 2016-01-27T04:38:44Z | 2016-01-27T05:13:44Z | MEMBER | I agree, this can be ambiguous. It makes sense for ordered mappings, but not for normal dicts. And unfortunately there is no Pythonic way to tell whether a mapping is ordered or not. I originally included it because I wanted to make sure operations like So I would support deprecating supplying dict-like coordinates without explicitly provided I don't want to simply error when coordinates have ambiguous lengths compared to the size of the data, because adding errors in special cases makes things harder to predict. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
128903340 |