issue_comments: 168354211
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/692#issuecomment-168354211 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/692 | 168354211 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODM1NDIxMQ== | 1217238 | 2016-01-02T01:11:13Z | 2016-01-02T01:11:37Z | MEMBER | The challenge is that the pandas Index has a much smaller API than numpy/dask.array. For example, it doesn't have a I'm all for preserving indexes (including all their quirks) in situations where it's possible. And in other cases, we should fall back to numpy arrays with dtype=object holding appropriate scalars. As for this particular issue, have you tested this after the changes in https://github.com/xray/xray/pull/691? I actually can't reproduce this issue on master. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
124441012 |