issue_comments: 1562615805
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7870#issuecomment-1562615805 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7870 | 1562615805 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dI5_9 | 3092444 | 2023-05-25T09:52:06Z | 2023-05-25T09:52:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you @TomNicholas, that is encouraging to hear. I will wait for @keewis to respond before filing a PR. FWIW, I have tested the modification I suggest in my fork of xarray, and it works well for our purposes. It just generalizes the exception catch. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1722614979 |