issue_comments: 156035236
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/655#issuecomment-156035236 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/655 | 156035236 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NjAzNTIzNg== | 10050469 | 2015-11-12T08:45:22Z | 2015-11-12T08:45:22Z | MEMBER | Hi @jhamman,
This is the actual purpose of my PR.
I tend to agree with that but this would break backwards compatibility. Previous behavior was to decide that if Some of the specs added a bit of boilerplate code, especially that one:
but my changes remain quite small and seem to have preserved backwards compatibility. I tried to cover all the use cases in my test function ( Critics and/or additional use cases welcome. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
116349205 |