issue_comments: 1533842816
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3213#issuecomment-1533842816 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3213 | 1533842816 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bbJWA | 41593244 | 2023-05-03T22:40:32Z | 2023-05-03T22:40:32Z | NONE | Hi all! As part of a research project, I'm looking to contribute to xArray's sparse capabilities, with an emphasis on sparse support for use-cases in the geosciences. I'm wondering if anyone in the geosciences (or adjacent disciplines!) has encountered problems with xArray's current level of sparse support, and what kinds of improvements they'd like to see to address those issues. From playing around, it seems the current strategy of backing DataArrays with COO sparse arrays takes care of a lot of use cases, but I have the following ideas that may (or may not) be useful to implement further:
I'd appreciate any feedback on these ideas, as well as any other things that would be nice to have implemented! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
479942077 |