issue_comments: 1483092471
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7657#issuecomment-1483092471 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7657 | 1483092471 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85YZjH3 | 14808389 | 2023-03-24T16:35:17Z | 2023-03-24T16:37:45Z | MEMBER | depends on the test, I guess. Most of them are related to one of the netcdf backends (not sure which, the tests don't specify that), I've also seen a drastic reduction in performance with HDF5 1.12.2 (both netcdf4 and h5netcdf) on one of my colleague's datasets, so maybe that's much more visible on a mac? That doesn't explain the slow Do we isolate the dask scheduler in any way? I assume that makes use of the builtin (non- |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1635470616 |