issue_comments: 146407349
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/608#issuecomment-146407349 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/608 | 146407349 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NjQwNzM0OQ== | 1217238 | 2015-10-08T03:23:35Z | 2015-11-15T21:50:18Z | MEMBER | I think pcolormesh is slightly more likely to yield correct and consistent results for plotting different types of data than our current hybrid of imshow/contourf. In my experience, pcolormesh also works better with cartopy. For default behavior, I would lean towards being correct rather than fast. Of course, waiting ~0.5 seconds per plot does start to add up when you're faceting, but it's not much more trouble to type .imshow. On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Joe Hamman notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
109665577 |