issue_comments: 146369228
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/608#issuecomment-146369228 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/608 | 146369228 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NjM2OTIyOA== | 1217238 | 2015-10-07T23:49:42Z | 2015-10-07T23:49:42Z | MEMBER | Originally, we only had imshow and contourf. We picked imshow as the default because it shows individual pixels. But pcolormesh also meets that criteria, and has the convenience of also working on non-evenly spaced grid. The only reason to possibly not pick pcolormesh is that it has a different convention from imshow in terms of the image orientation (top-left vs bottom-left origin). Given that xray is largely used for data with meaningful coordinate labels (rather than images), I think it's probably a better choice to use the bottom-left origin as a default. It composing better, for example, with 1D plots. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
109665577 |