home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 1398017683

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7348#issuecomment-1398017683 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7348 1398017683 IC_kwDOAMm_X85TVA6T 1386642 2023-01-20T07:37:12Z 2023-01-20T07:41:06Z CONTRIBUTOR

I see your point, but xarray could do both, and most accessors I've used come in a pip installable package and we can make that workflow a bit smoother with entry points. IMO it is an advantage of entrypoints that they don't require editing source code, just a 1 line change to a setup.py, setup.cfg, or pyproject.toml.

I wonder how often "users" define their own accessors...I use python functions and modules. The "black magic" you mention breaks most static analysis tooling (type checking, linting, completion) and saves at most a couple of characters, so I never felt the need, but that's a discussion for another day.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  1473152374
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.704ms · About: xarray-datasette