issue_comments: 1336299057
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7344#issuecomment-1336299057 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7344 | 1336299057 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ppk4x | 1217238 | 2022-12-04T01:55:34Z | 2022-12-04T01:55:34Z | MEMBER | The case where Bottleneck really makes a difference was for moving window statistics, where it uses a smarter algorithm than our current NumPy implementation, which creating a moving window view. Otherwise, I agree, it probably isn't worth the trouble. That said -- we could also switch to smarter NumPy based algorithms to implement most moving window calculations, e.g,. using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1471685307 |