issue_comments: 1323478134
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7297#issuecomment-1323478134 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7297 | 1323478134 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85O4qx2 | 4160723 | 2022-11-22T10:50:01Z | 2022-11-22T10:50:01Z | MEMBER | Interesting! I don't think that when adding stack / unstack we were thinking that variables with only a subset of the stacked dimensions would be a common use case. I guess it would be possible to add some option to stack only the variables that have all the dimensions to be stacked, and leave the other variables unchanged? However, one problem with keeping the original dimension coordinates is that we would have name conflicts between the single index coordinates and the multi-index coordinates. In your expected example, the "x" coordinate is part of the multi-index but it doesn't have the same dimension "midx"? I find it rather confusing. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1454832041 |