home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 1293624950

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7222#issuecomment-1293624950 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7222 1293624950 IC_kwDOAMm_X85NGyZ2 4160723 2022-10-27T14:37:10Z 2022-10-27T14:37:10Z MEMBER

Thanks @hmaarrfk!

I think the rapid return, helps by about 40% is still pretty good.

Yes definitely. I think we just forgot to add it.

However, I will argue that Aligner should really not be a class.

The reason of using a class is mainly for better code readability and also so that it is easier to refactor later. The alignment logic is really complex with lots of intermediate objects that are created and/or used at various stages. Probably using functions with some custom containers would have achieved the same goal, to be fair. This part of Xarray internals still deserves to be improved, but that would be a lot of work especially for such a critical piece of code in Xarray.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  1423321834
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.763ms · About: xarray-datasette