issue_comments: 1290186004
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7181#issuecomment-1290186004 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7181 | 1290186004 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85M5q0U | 1486942 | 2022-10-25T08:31:50Z | 2022-10-25T08:31:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I think it has to be something like that. I'll see if I can dig into what these Datasets look like. I'm sure we can get away with fewer deep copies here. I think it's something like we're caching generated Datasets between different test cases, but some of them need to modify them so they're deep copied. I guess previously that was fine, but maybe now it's just cheaper to make new instances from scratch. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1412895383 |