issue_comments: 127507325
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/509#issuecomment-127507325 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/509 | 127507325 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNzUwNzMyNQ== | 1217238 | 2015-08-04T07:30:37Z | 2015-08-04T07:30:37Z | MEMBER | Decided to try reorganizing things and got sucked in, so I ended up making a PR to your fork with some tweaks: https://github.com/jhamman/xray/pull/1 This assuredly still needs more tests -- mostly to verify that every plot types ends up with consistent levels. Here's my demo notebook: https://gist.github.com/shoyer/e6fafbc672021600d9f3 and a teaser:
The main difference in functionality is in my PR is that Also, I entirely replaced the levels calculation in contour/contourf with our calculated levels instead of merely trying to replicate it. That ensures things are guaranteed to be exactly identical across all plot types. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
98629509 |